UltraPack 2.0 or HSFX?
#65

One thing in advance: Kwiatek, could you do me a favour in recognizing that none of us, neither you, me, or anybody else involved here or at UP or anywhere else where this discussion is alive, is "whining", "screaming" or whatever else I've had to read? This would make reading your posts much more pleasure, at least to me. Thank you.
Additionally please let me show respect to your work on the FMs which is highly appreciated.
I understand that it's a lot of work which you've been doing, you invested a lot of time and effort and gathered pretty much experience, which is definitely way ahead of everything about FM modeling I could think of atm.
By being a bit more polite and maybe thinking again about some of Monguse's and Z's arguments, especially respecting someone else's work, you could gain a lot of glory, honor and admiration for your work.

Monguse Wrote:Both avenues are acceptable provided the end user gets the whole package and not anything less.
Yes, yes and again: YES!
That's what I'm talking about all the time.
I don't mind false FMs. I don't mind modified FMs. I don't mind partial "historicalization".
As long as I can get hands on the whole package and thus being free to choose which parts of it I like to use, I feel comfortable with each and every work that's being applied to this wonderful game by it's hopefully then rejoined community.
Joining Z's allegory, if my favourite grocery would decide that peppers have to be red, I'd rather switch to another one where I can have the peppers in the colour of my choice, no matter whether or not I like reds the most.

Best regards - Mike
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)