28.01.2010, 09:19
I posted this question in another thread a few days ago but didn't receive an answer; besides, I thought that not only I have this problem.
I like the SFS extractor but - if I need a specific file I have to open each and every SFS archive which takes a lot of time and look through all the files packed in it (which is not easy since they don't seem to follow ANY general rule). The SFS extractor is obviously able to see which files are present in a SFS archive - after all, it shows the file names. Can it be rewritten in a way that it creates a text file with all the (known) contents so that one only has to search these text files? Or did I miss something where someone already did this?
I would really appreciate an answer! It would make life so much easier...
I like the SFS extractor but - if I need a specific file I have to open each and every SFS archive which takes a lot of time and look through all the files packed in it (which is not easy since they don't seem to follow ANY general rule). The SFS extractor is obviously able to see which files are present in a SFS archive - after all, it shows the file names. Can it be rewritten in a way that it creates a text file with all the (known) contents so that one only has to search these text files? Or did I miss something where someone already did this?
I would really appreciate an answer! It would make life so much easier...