[ACE-OF-ACES]

While we are on the subject of questions

I thought I would run the numbers on the HISTOMOD 1.1 vs HISTOMOD 1.3 using SJacks zinfomod

Here is what I found

From HISTOMOD 1.1

Real world Data vs. IL-2 data with regards to the HISTOMOD 1.1 F-86A rate of climb

As you can see, Freddy's F-86A climbs much better than a real F-86A

How much better?

Well here is two ways to measure that

ROC ERROR from HISTOMOD 1.1

As you can see, at SL it climbs ~2,600fpm BETTER than a real F-86A

ROC PERCENT ERROR from HISTOMOD 1.1

As you can see, at SL it has a % error of ~34% and increases to 57% at 35kft

Now lets take a look at the new and improved HISTOMOD 1.3

Real world Data vs. IL-2 data with regards to the HISTOMOD 1.3 F-86A rate of climb

As you can see, Freddy's F-86A still climbs much better than a real F-86A, as a mater of fact it has got even better since 1.1

How much better?

Well here is two ways to measure that

ROC ERROR from HISTOMOD 1.3

As you can see, at SL it climbs ~3,250fpm BETTER than a real F-86A, that is up from the ~2,600fpm better in 1.1

ROC PERCENT ERROR from HISTOMOD 1.3

As you can see, at SL it has a % error of ~42% and increases to 69% at 35kft, that is up from the 34% and 57% error in 1.1

So, now I am really wondering what the HISTOMOD adds, changes, and or is incomparable with

In that it would have to be something really cool for me to justify looking past these arcade FM values