[ACE-OF-ACES]

But the curves he made about the Corea 1.3 are wrong .

Freddy, I think you are forgeting that I did a test that proves ZINFOMOD takes into account your Java class changes.

viewtopic.php?t=22495&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=180

If you will remember, back in your other post on the HISTOMOD, I 1st tested your F86A with SJacks ZINFOMOD which showed your F86A having an ROC ~10,000fpm @ SL. After that you said, much like your saying now, that those curves were wrong! And your reason for why they were wrong is you said the ZINFOMOD does not take into accont your Java class changes. To test that theory I than did, what you called, a 'real fly' test. Where I collected data via DeviceLink and ploted it.
I did several climb tests at differnt climb speeds and picked the one that gave me the largest ROC @ SL.





As you can see in the graphs above, that testing showed your F86A has an ROC @ SL of ~9,400fpm. Granted not the 10,000fpm that ZINFOMOD predicted, but MUCH LARGER THAN THE 7,500fpm the F86A SHOULD HAVE! And thus debunking your theory that ZINFOMOD does not take into account your Java class changes. It clearly does, in that 9,400fpm is very close to 10,00fpm, much closer to 10,00fpm than 7,500fpm. And I think if I were to fly it at a climb speed inbetween 250 and 300 (say 275) that it would obtain the 10,000fpm.