23.02.2010, 09:09
In order to compare we have to name the source. This has been done over the years at UBI showing in game performance to the real world values. The same applies to other sims no matter the venue as long as real world data is available.
Take for instance a tank simulation and you have two tanks, one a Jagdpanther (sloped front based on the Panther chassis) the other a T34. One would have to compare otherwise what's the sense in have a simulation.
Reports can be used for two purposes the first is to verify what one is doing is correct the other to use it to rub peoples nose in it. I always prefer the first option, I never use the second. However, many people as we have noticed use the second option.
Another reason for this report is to document how FM's perform per pack. Why? The answer is simple, if any migration is to occur you have to document first then decide.
As I had noted previously, we have had these reports for a while and we (our team) will be using the first option to verify what one is doing is correct to hone the FM and performances if required.
On the projects front, much is still being done.
Take for instance a tank simulation and you have two tanks, one a Jagdpanther (sloped front based on the Panther chassis) the other a T34. One would have to compare otherwise what's the sense in have a simulation.
Reports can be used for two purposes the first is to verify what one is doing is correct the other to use it to rub peoples nose in it. I always prefer the first option, I never use the second. However, many people as we have noticed use the second option.
Another reason for this report is to document how FM's perform per pack. Why? The answer is simple, if any migration is to occur you have to document first then decide.
As I had noted previously, we have had these reports for a while and we (our team) will be using the first option to verify what one is doing is correct to hone the FM and performances if required.
On the projects front, much is still being done.