[BillSwagger]

And in some respect I can understand why he did, in that for ever 'one' pilot report/account of him pushing 90" over Berlin, we don't know how many pilots did the same and had the engine blow up in their face, and thus never had a chance to write a report/account. But now with the mods we can do things that Oleg would have never done, and than leave it to the 'user' of the game to decide if he wants to use the mod or not.

Not every engine rating has a test or manual to prove it either, in fact, much of the time engine ratings were improved because pilots were beating engines up running them at higher boost ratings and landing with no engine problems. Later tests are done to see the performance gains and build the modifications into a production block.

I just think that what you are doing is going to have its own degree of error.

I too get disgruntled when i see planes under performing while other planes over perform and leads me to think that there is some biased in the community.

I'm not sure to what degree or extent one needs to go to disprove what is represented but using the forum to discuss proper models and procedure is exactly why its here. After all, its the modders responsibility to make sure the game runs smoothly and accurately. I'm not sure if they listen or even take it as a consideration, but my thinking is that they do especially if you can back up with what you're showing/saying with documentation.




Bill