22.03.2010, 09:52
Well, I'm going to be an adult and ignore being called and "ijit".
If I hated the shot I would have ignored it, and moved on. Historical accuracy aside, the P-40 actually looks as though it belongs in the picture. That's what actually interests me most. If it wasn't there, and he put it in, it's very convincing. The lighting is right. The mountains are lit from the sun, the same way, in the shot. A lot of guys don't get that right and the plane looks tacked on. I'd like to know if the original picture contained the P-40, cause if it didn't, I'd like to know how it was done and would like to try it.
If I hated the shot I would have ignored it, and moved on. Historical accuracy aside, the P-40 actually looks as though it belongs in the picture. That's what actually interests me most. If it wasn't there, and he put it in, it's very convincing. The lighting is right. The mountains are lit from the sun, the same way, in the shot. A lot of guys don't get that right and the plane looks tacked on. I'd like to know if the original picture contained the P-40, cause if it didn't, I'd like to know how it was done and would like to try it.