14.04.2010, 17:43
BillSwagger Wrote:I don't see how what you've provided is anything more than a theory. Its just packaged in a neat presentation, but still a theory.Well based on what you have said thus far I am not suprised that you don't see it
Like I said if you think those guys were so stupid back than that they were not capable of colecting data
That's fine
I for one just give them more credit
BillSwagger Wrote:I'd do the leg work too, but its easier to ask the questions. :lol:Again
Not suprised
Movie critics are a dime a dozen
It actully takes some knolwage and effort to make a movie
BillSwagger Wrote:Perhaps asking the proper questions addresses other areas of research that could be looked at more closely, by me, you , or who ever has the time for it.Sure toss out as many theories as you like
Heck bring up the question of sun spots and what the pilot had for breakfast the day of the test
There all great theories
Just don't be suprised if most of us don't get too excited about them
BillSwagger Wrote:Also, did you climb the planes yourself, or use another method?another method
BillSwagger Wrote:I find the AI climbs much better.No AI was employed here
BillSwagger Wrote:Another note, as much as its been disputed in the past, the HSFX mods did mod some of the stock planes. You may be testing modded aircraft and not a stock plane. To be certain you should be using a vanilla copy of 4.09m with no mods.Another neat theory
But Ill have to take Mongue's and all the mod makers I have worked with word over yours
In that they have showed me the stock FMs vs. the modded FM's which proves your theory is wrong