REALISM RATING of the HSFX 4.1 Bf-109K-4
#50

RedChico Wrote:I called myself names, not to you, that shows the amount of arrogance and disrespect you have.
That is your story

But clearly the mod did not buy your story either

In that he edited your post

Again nice try

But no sale

RedChico Wrote:What about your response then? Instead of responding to me on a polite maner you kept insulting phrase upon phrase.
I simply quoted what you said to me back to you

RedChico Wrote:Of course i knew those were 262's.
Truth be told the only reason your posting in this thread is because you are still upset with me for pointing out your error in the other thread

Readers Digest version of the othe thread

I and others were talking about the Ta183 and how the drawings and blue prints at Luft46 are all fake

And that the likly hood of the Ta183 being build in WWII were slim to none in that all they really had to show for it was a wooden wind tunnel model

At which point you decided to chime in and say that not only are their real blue prints but that the Germans had build a prototype and that the US had captured said prototype and brought it bacck to the US for testing.

At which point alot of us got a pretty good laugh at your expence

In that was not true

You confused a Messer prototye with the Fockwolf Ta183

And now here you are still upset and trying to get some sort of payback for me pointing our your mistake

RedChico Wrote:Victim? I don't need pity from others especially yours, i'm fine thanks for asking.
Yes victiim

And you have my pitty wether you like it or not

In that it is pretty sad that you feel the need to come to post in this thread because you made such a fool of yourself in the other thread

RedChico Wrote:The problem is you not me.
Classic

Your the one that had to resort to name calling

Such that the mod had to edit your post

And I am the problem?

Again

Nice try

But no sale

RedChico Wrote:Also, i already pointed to you your mistake comparing the IL2 P51 D30NA against a real a P51 B we (me and others) told to compare apples with apples mean P51 D30 against P51 D30 and if you don't have real world data then do not compare, but you acted arrogant because you're rigth and the rest of the world is wrong isn't that correct?
Correct

So add that to the list of things your still upset about

It would be one thing if I tried to hide the fact that I was comparing P51B data to a P51D

But I didn't and I clearly noted the limitaions of the comparson

RedChico Wrote:I'm still waiting for the original documents of all your comparisons, ACE-OF-ACES.
I know

You hang on my every word
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)