17.04.2010, 10:53
Quote:In that there was nothing partial about it
You were totally wrong when you said the US captured a Ta183 prototype and took it back to the US for testing!!
Now here is the short list of things I will require an apologies and/or you admitting you were wrong If you want me to answer any of your questions from here on out
Let me explain a bit more, because you're the one not reading posts correctly.
The picture i posted is part of the Operation LUSTY (capture of german tech) and its on of the trips they made of course that picture shows 262's (i'm not stupid as you said i was) on the deck, also said that there's another picture of the other trip (taken from above, probably the bridge and wich i don't have, but seen it at least in a documentary) showing several other planes incluiding a He 162 and 1 airplane that i thought it was a Ta 183.
But what i was seeing after all was a Me P1101, it's very similar to the Ta 183, same wing configuration same fuselage configuration with the only diference of the elevator position.
Quote:There is more but that should be enough
Now to be honest..
You and I both know your not man enough to admit you made a mistake
Let along man enough to apologize for all the things you have done
1) I already admited but since you ask again, i'm sorry i was particially wrong on the grounds i wrote above.
2) I called my self what i called no to you, but one thing i'm not is arrogant (thats not a name but a trait), since it was you that called me more names than me.
3) Again it was you that did all the name calling.
4) I'll not apologize since i've read your 109K report and didn't find true references/bibliographies only 2 graphs.
5) All your imagination like mine imagening a Ta 183 instead of a Me P1101, silly me.
Quote:Im sure you will have some flipped response back to this
But know that I wont be wasting any more of my time on you
And anyone else with your attitude
In that you have added nothing to the topic thus far
Except to expose to us all just how upset you are with me for pointing out your mistakes
And that you didn't fully read and/or fully understand what you read in the pdf file before commenting on it
Because to be honest
Life is short and there are just too many other people here who actually have something to contribute to the topic at hand that I would much rather spend my time talking to
Unless I am really board than I do reserve the right to reply to you when I see you stick your foot in your mouth
I don't need to come up with any response cause you're already doing it for me, still insulting heim?
I also have some demands:
1) Remove your previous report of "IL2 P51D-30 vs real P51B", and replace with a "apples Vs apples" and if you don't have "real world data", don't post it.
I know that you say in your reports (and that means i've read it), those are calculated graphs but we (yes we) still need to see in what report they were in.... and you still haven't come up with that, hell i'm not asking where and how did you got them anymore.
2) Keep your report simple, don't paint them with fancy stuff like that NACA front page, or the old type font, you're doing these report to show us whats diferent and whats not and not to get a grade in school.
3) And, i know its hard, but stop being arrogant and rude, you had lots and lots of chances to do that but kept responding badly, not only against me but against others (that's is if you remember what you wrote). Because you're the only one here that's that rude and arrogant (not name calling but a trait that everyone doesn't like), not even me when i was a admin on AAA server, as i always had proof (replays) to back me up on all bans issued.
4) Apologize to us (yes not only me), it's not me who as to produce apologies because i only respond to insults.
Thats it, i'll rest my case when you do these points or when someone else gets involved to resolve this matter.