18.04.2010, 19:32
BillSwagger Wrote:It saves time to pursue recorded information found in flight test data.True
But that is not the reason it is better than combat reports
Test data is collected under controlled conditions
Combat reports are not
BillSwagger Wrote:That's the easy part and if it were that open and shut we'd all be in agreeance.Well it is not that easy
And if you think their is a lot of disagreement now
Wait until you present you 'conclusion' you drew from your statistical analysis of those combat reports
BillSwagger Wrote:I also see a bit of mistrust that i don't care to get in the middle of but i think it waste more time trying to substantiate or discredit a source than just looking at the additional documentation provided and reading what its actually portraying and then quietly drawing my own conclusions.Not sure what your referring to there
BillSwagger Wrote:Knocking people down or the information they provide is not conducive to building, its actually more destructive than anything, and has a way of alienating people. I'm not singling anyone out, i just think sometimes i see threads that carry on for pages about the legitimacy of an opinion, when the actual source (i.e. the facts) itself still has value especially if the current information is limited and leads to oversimplified results.Not sure what your referring to there either
BillSwagger Wrote:Simplicity does not constitute completeness, although that does contradict the idea that the most simple explanation is usually the correct one.Ok make that three for three
In that I am not sure what your referring to there either
Stop beating around the bush and just say it