REALISM RATING of the HSFX 4.1 Spitfire IX 25lb
#27

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:Also beware anyone that trys to overwhelm you by simply posting a bunch of links to multiple reports

Under the guise that you should simply trust them that they made the right choice between which data to use


What are you referring to?

Its rhetorical, Ace, so don't answer it and like i said i'm not attmepting to single you out, you just pushed me to answer you more concretely and your previous post was a prime example.

i think this attitude is unhealthy for building, and i know you are not the only one to adopt this attitude and that you don't always reflect this attitude 100 percent of the time.

A researcher should be unbiased and willing to consider all data presented to them and leave their own thoughts at the door, agreed?

"The most simple explanation is often the correct one."

I was making no specific reference to anything, i just offer it as a wise suggestion when approaching data that people seem to have such differing opinions over.

I guess in my mind i'm hoping that we see one version of the sim one day, and i really get tired of seeing repeatedly toxic spats that only seem to disrupt any progress toward unity. This goes for everyone, including myself.

that's all

Bill
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)