18.04.2010, 21:01
Bill, though I appreciate your passion in discussion, I think that you missed ACE-OF-ACES issue - completely - on this one.
There was a specific notorious topic post at a particular unnamed, but well known website this year which many people in the know still remember very well. A bunch of bloviating statements were made with hollow information in the topic. The links which were provided were widely viewed as avoiding direct debate and seemed to many to be hiding empty debate positions behind a smoke cloud of claims.
Earlier, you expressed appreciation for the progress which ACE-OF-ACES is making in the flight model analysis, especially compared to the empty alternative. You were on the right course at that time :wink:
I must give you credit, you sure helped bring the issue more light, in your own way.
There was a specific notorious topic post at a particular unnamed, but well known website this year which many people in the know still remember very well. A bunch of bloviating statements were made with hollow information in the topic. The links which were provided were widely viewed as avoiding direct debate and seemed to many to be hiding empty debate positions behind a smoke cloud of claims.
Earlier, you expressed appreciation for the progress which ACE-OF-ACES is making in the flight model analysis, especially compared to the empty alternative. You were on the right course at that time :wink:
I must give you credit, you sure helped bring the issue more light, in your own way.