Spitfire Mk1 and F86
#23

Eexhaton Wrote:I smell this topic spinning off in the regurgitation of the same subject that has been discussed countless number of times,
including the name calling..

Take that crud back to the UbiZ00 :roll:

Don't claim anything you can't ever supply the proof for and be so mature not to start pointing fingers.
I'd say; keep it civil, or a lock should be requested.


Good day, Eexhaton

Though I agree with your moral principles in the above quote, I totally disagree with your opininion about our progress here.


New perspectives are constantly being added.

A label in the general category of name calling is appropriate only if it is factually based and not intended to be insulting. Example: "Your mother is uninformed about that", would be appropriate in general and in context. "Yo mama is a stupid nag", would be unappropriate. If it is the "civil" truth and yet hurts overly sensitve feelings, then that is not the fault of the labeller. Some of what is considered civil or uncivil is subjective.

Calling people what they are and labelling things as they are will continue from me with mercy and restraint. Flight model moral support will get my attention for quite a while to come. The strength of this movement at AAA is increasing.

Some labels are appropriate. "Kid arcade style" is an appropriate label in the right context, in my opinion.


As for providing evidence, ACE-OF-ACES methods are vastly more transparent and reliable than UltraPack to this time.

Here is the proof:

REALISM RATINGS
Spitfire IX 25lb
Bf-109K-4
F-51D-30NA HSFX 4.1
F-51D-30NA UP1.8
F-51D-30NA UP2.0


FM ANALYSIS
Bf-109K-4
P-47Ds
F-86s
MiG-15s
P-38s

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:You wont find this kind of openness on the discussion of the flight model implementations over at UltraPack that lays it all out on the talbe for all to see

Over there you have to be a good lemming and simply 'trust' them :?

I agree with this, since I have read the flight model threads at UP on a bunch of occassions. The flight model data publication here is superior and the testing methods here are standard.

I believe that AAA is taking the morally high altitude by refraining from locking this and future threads, in general. The words and responses here have been of better quality than at UltraPack.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)