16.05.2010, 10:36
I am sorrry BUT:
Map is beautiful and has a big interset for the historic and semi historic builders .
Lands and towns are OK.
Airfield are totaly awful, I mean about textures.
Too much transpanracy, too much flat, as I said all the airfields are ugly.
Perhaps in HSFX are they OK but a copy/past is not a good solution with UP to have good result.
Nevertheless I know how much time and how difficult is the job for this sort of creation, I do not shout against the creator.
When something is not beautiful or wrong, why saying outstanding job, awesome and all sorts or nonsense.
The quality of the airfields is not in accordance with the map, we have to give the thrue opinion to the builder...
I will take time to modify those airfields and give them a good structure, for me and if I success and if the owner is all right I will give him the result for the community like he did withe his map.
Thanks for your job
Map is beautiful and has a big interset for the historic and semi historic builders .
Lands and towns are OK.
Airfield are totaly awful, I mean about textures.
Too much transpanracy, too much flat, as I said all the airfields are ugly.
Perhaps in HSFX are they OK but a copy/past is not a good solution with UP to have good result.
Nevertheless I know how much time and how difficult is the job for this sort of creation, I do not shout against the creator.
When something is not beautiful or wrong, why saying outstanding job, awesome and all sorts or nonsense.
The quality of the airfields is not in accordance with the map, we have to give the thrue opinion to the builder...
I will take time to modify those airfields and give them a good structure, for me and if I success and if the owner is all right I will give him the result for the community like he did withe his map.
Thanks for your job