Thread Closed

FM of P51
#52

RAF209_Python Wrote:Salute

After reading all the posts in this topic everyone has an opinion but remember this is a game no matter how much data you have it will never be realistic no matter how hard you try a pc game will never take the place of the real thing a pc game is just that a pc game so try to remember that when going into these types of discussions. Never let these discussions get personal it does no one any good I like reading the data or opinons some have it is interesting.
Agreed 100%

And as I have said a thousand times over the past 20+ years of simming

No flight sim ever was.. is.. or will be perfect (read real)

But that does not mean we should not strive to make it as real as possible

Especially when it comes to the accuracy of the flight models

Now clearly the Quake types of flight simmers will welcome a Bf109 with a rate of climb that is 30% better than the real 109, in that it only helps them with their high score

But there are others in this game that think a 30% error is too much

As a mater of fact

This FM forum is for the later

While on that note

It is IMHO that the problem with this forum is NOT due to the folks like me who prefer accuracy in their FMs

The problem with this forum is the Quake types that feel the need to come in here and try and belittle the folks like me that do prefer accuracy in their FMs

Thus I would say this to those Quake types

If you don't like topics dedicated to the discussion of the accuracy of FMs

Stay out of them

It is that simple
Thread Closed


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)