06.08.2010, 12:13
Hi Fireskull,
thanks for your opinions!
I've been for a long time playing with the highest option in the landscape lighting which is the "excellent" option but I'll give a try to the lower options to see what happens.
Not sure I made myself understood, let me try with some other pictures
![[Image: 800px-Negoiu.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/adonisl/800px-Negoiu.jpg)
![[Image: 453780970f9c1ec6c26a1700c10831b75ec434665.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/adonisl/453780970f9c1ec6c26a1700c10831b75ec434665.jpg)
Ever saw such a lighting like this in il2? (please try to make abstraction of the beauty of the landscape
)
Second pic has two different lighting regions. The shadow one, this looks like what il2 renders. Of course the il2 landscape may look brighter around noon, but it still has the "FLATNESS" of the shadowy part of the image. Once again I have no idea what gives the difference?! :mrgreen: :oops: :mrgreen: Need the auto-head-smashing hammer icon badly... :mrgreen:
thanks for your opinions!
I've been for a long time playing with the highest option in the landscape lighting which is the "excellent" option but I'll give a try to the lower options to see what happens.
Not sure I made myself understood, let me try with some other pictures
Ever saw such a lighting like this in il2? (please try to make abstraction of the beauty of the landscape
)Second pic has two different lighting regions. The shadow one, this looks like what il2 renders. Of course the il2 landscape may look brighter around noon, but it still has the "FLATNESS" of the shadowy part of the image. Once again I have no idea what gives the difference?! :mrgreen: :oops: :mrgreen: Need the auto-head-smashing hammer icon badly... :mrgreen: