27.10.2010, 11:46
Quote:Nope I did not do thatCorrect, its was real P-51B against IL2 P-51D-25, even worse.
Went back to your thread and I see you managed to edited you work with "calculated" P-51D, with no explanation how you calculated it.
Quote:You lost me there.. still
See this is the part I was referring to about the teacher vs student
I (the student) told you before I don't know what you are (the teacher) referring to with this Maclaren reference
At which point the you had the opportunity to explain yourself better (be the teacher)
But instead you choose to imply that 'I will never understand'
And I never will until you explain yourself better
Hence the student vs. teacher reference
I already did, you just looping around it and you keep posting like that just to make belive that you're right.
Its impossible to have a discussion with you because you keep looping around and around so that you're always right and everyone else is wrong.