27.10.2010, 11:57
RedChico Wrote:So let me see if I understand what your saying..Quote:Nope I did not do thatCorrect, its was real P-51B against IL2 P-51D-25, even worse.
Went back to your thread and I see you managed to edited you work with "calculated" P-51D, with no explanation how you calculated it.
You admit your 'memory' was in error wrt the 25 vs. 30
And now your trying to imply that I edited my works since the last time you looked at it becuase it does not look the way you 'remember' it
RedChico Wrote:Really?Quote:You lost me there.. stillI already did, you just looping around it and you keep posting like that just to make belive that you're right.
See this is the part I was referring to about the teacher vs student
I (the student) told you before I don't know what you are (the teacher) referring to with this Maclaren reference
At which point the you had the opportunity to explain yourself better (be the teacher)
But instead you choose to imply that 'I will never understand'
And I never will until you explain yourself better
Hence the student vs. teacher reference
Care to 'quote' the part that you consider where you claim to have explaned this
Because honestly I don't see it
RedChico Wrote:Its impossible to have a discussion with you because you keep looping around and around so that you're always right and everyone else is wrong.Well I am big enough to admit when I made a mistake
So here is your chance..
Prove me wrong and quote where you said you explane who and what this 'Maclaren' reference is about
Untill than IMHO your the one looping around