27.10.2010, 15:41
You still looping around the same crap like a bad record player.
At least you're consistant.
I also like the cunning way you ofend ppl inbetween the lines, nice work.
The Maclaren example you can figure it out because i know you're smart.
The "25" and "30" case, i did it on purpose, and boy you're quite predictable.
Anyone can check the edit dates, the responses (not only my but by others too) to your initial work and your last post.
Perhaps it was magic that calculated the p-51D data, as you don't even say what you did to get those "calculated" values.
As i said in that thread if you don't have real data to compare it, don't compare.
Loopy loop. :mrgreen:
At least you're consistant.
I also like the cunning way you ofend ppl inbetween the lines, nice work.
The Maclaren example you can figure it out because i know you're smart.
The "25" and "30" case, i did it on purpose, and boy you're quite predictable.
Anyone can check the edit dates, the responses (not only my but by others too) to your initial work and your last post.
Perhaps it was magic that calculated the p-51D data, as you don't even say what you did to get those "calculated" values.
As i said in that thread if you don't have real data to compare it, don't compare.
Loopy loop. :mrgreen: