[ACE-OF-ACES]

You still looping around the same crap like a bad record player.
At least you're consistant.
I also like the cunning way you ofend ppl inbetween the lines, nice work.

The Maclaren example you can figure it out because i know you're smart.

The "25" and "30" case, i did it on purpose, and boy you're quite predictable.
Anyone can check the edit dates, the responses (not only my but by others too) to your initial work and your last post.
Perhaps it was magic that calculated the p-51D data, as you don't even say what you did to get those "calculated" values.
As i said in that thread if you don't have real data to compare it, don't compare.

Loopy loop. :mrgreen:

So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because you weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks!