09.06.2013, 03:33
Wow! Whats happened to this thread since I was away.
My original request was for some proof to be posted to backup the statement that Max had "ripped off" textures which were Ice's original work (as per the M4T incident).
No proof has been provided. I must conclude therefore that none exists and that Ice's original stance on this was an error on his part.
Beo needs to stop posting about this as if he knows it to be a fact when in truth he is only surmising based on, at best, second hand information.
Ice'e apology to Max is accepted by all parties as a fact, which most would think would close the matter.
But now Ice says that his apology was not an admission that he was wrong --- just a vague apology --- for something.
What was the original wording of the apology? We only have Ice's subsequent interpretation.
The most important thing is the lack of proof to backup the original "ripped off" accusation.
Does any exist? Try and stay focussed Beo. This is the bit where you are invited to provide an answer.
Ashe
My original request was for some proof to be posted to backup the statement that Max had "ripped off" textures which were Ice's original work (as per the M4T incident).
No proof has been provided. I must conclude therefore that none exists and that Ice's original stance on this was an error on his part.
Beo needs to stop posting about this as if he knows it to be a fact when in truth he is only surmising based on, at best, second hand information.
Ice'e apology to Max is accepted by all parties as a fact, which most would think would close the matter.
But now Ice says that his apology was not an admission that he was wrong --- just a vague apology --- for something.
What was the original wording of the apology? We only have Ice's subsequent interpretation.
The most important thing is the lack of proof to backup the original "ripped off" accusation.
Does any exist? Try and stay focussed Beo. This is the bit where you are invited to provide an answer.
Ashe