11.06.2009, 01:13
Nice!
[WIP]Bf 110D-0 + D-0/B + D-3 + E
11.06.2009, 01:38
Looks great so far 
, what is left to do?
, what is left to do?
11.06.2009, 01:54
EXCELLENT!!!
11.06.2009, 02:22
Looking great, will be a welcome addition
11.06.2009, 18:08
si1va Wrote:Looks great so far
- minor 3D fixes and corrections
- FM
- class work
- new loadouts
11.06.2009, 18:22
Loadouts for the D-0/B will be:
2x SC250
2x SC500
2x SD500
2x PC1000
1x SC1000
1x SD1000
2x SC250
2x SC500
2x SD500
2x PC1000
1x SC1000
1x SD1000
11.06.2009, 23:56
S!
This is what I wonder when looking at your loadout table Zorin. Most German planes can not carry the SD-bombs, all they are offered is AB or SC. Feels a bit odd to use a SC against soft targets when the SD would do the job better...
This is what I wonder when looking at your loadout table Zorin. Most German planes can not carry the SD-bombs, all they are offered is AB or SC. Feels a bit odd to use a SC against soft targets when the SD would do the job better...
12.06.2009, 06:49
Zorin Wrote:si1va Wrote:Looks great so far
- minor 3D fixes and corrections
- FM
- class work
- new loadouts
It's those "minor 3D corrections" of yours that I love so much. :wink:
12.06.2009, 07:04
May be I'm wrong but the Bf 110D-0 & D-1 are the Dackelbauch version.
Anyway good job!!
Me too
Anyway good job!!
Bee Wrote:It's those "minor 3D corrections" of yours that I love so much. :wink:
Me too
12.06.2009, 10:07
OberstDanjeje Wrote:May be I'm wrong but the Bf 110D-0 & D-1 are the Dackelbauch version.
Anyway good job!!
Bee Wrote:It's those "minor 3D corrections" of yours that I love so much. :wink:
Me too
The initial D-0 version did have the Dackelbauch. The D-1 had the attachments to have the Dackelbauch fitted but not always as they also could attach bomb racks in its place.
The D-1 version was a minor player in the Bf-110D family and often confused with the D-3 variant. What mainly saw combat was the D-0/B with Erpr 210 during the Battle of Britain and the D-3 variant which saw extensive service on many fronts.
The D-3 was designed specifically not have attachments for the Dackelbauch instead having fuel tanks under the wings and an oil tank underneath its center fuselage...along with bomb racks.
12.06.2009, 10:20
Lookin great, Zorin- love the closed rear canopy.
12.06.2009, 14:49
Graf Wrote:OberstDanjeje Wrote:May be I'm wrong but the Bf 110D-0 & D-1 are the Dackelbauch version.
Anyway good job!!
Bee Wrote:It's those "minor 3D corrections" of yours that I love so much. :wink:
Me too
The initial D-0 version did have the Dackelbauch. The D-1 had the attachments to have the Dackelbauch fitted but not always as they also could attach bomb racks in its place.
The D-1 version was a minor player in the Bf-110D family and often confused with the D-3 variant. What mainly saw combat was the D-0/B with Erpr 210 during the Battle of Britain and the D-3 variant which saw extensive service on many fronts.
The D-3 was designed specifically not have attachments for the Dackelbauch instead having fuel tanks under the wings and an oil tank underneath its center fuselage...along with bomb racks.
Hi!
It's all correct , I would like to specify that the abandonment of Dackelbauch was due his tendency to chatch fire due the gasoline vapors remained inside after the fuel consumption and that my source refere that the underneath oil tank was employed only for long distance flights with the huge wing tanks and not during normal range flight. The extended tail was a standard issue for the D3 with a float inside!
cheers
walter
SEMPER INCOMMODUS
12.06.2009, 15:02
walter_solito Wrote:Graf Wrote:OberstDanjeje Wrote:May be I'm wrong but the Bf 110D-0 & D-1 are the Dackelbauch version.
Anyway good job!!
Bee Wrote:It's those "minor 3D corrections" of yours that I love so much. :wink:
Me too
The initial D-0 version did have the Dackelbauch. The D-1 had the attachments to have the Dackelbauch fitted but not always as they also could attach bomb racks in its place.
The D-1 version was a minor player in the Bf-110D family and often confused with the D-3 variant. What mainly saw combat was the D-0/B with Erpr 210 during the Battle of Britain and the D-3 variant which saw extensive service on many fronts.
The D-3 was designed specifically not have attachments for the Dackelbauch instead having fuel tanks under the wings and an oil tank underneath its center fuselage...along with bomb racks.
Hi!
It's all correct , I would like to specify that the abandonment of Dackelbauch was due his tendency to chatch fire due the gasoline vapors remained inside after the fuel consumption and that my source refere that the underneath oil tank was employed only for long distance flights with the huge wing tanks and not during normal range flight. The extended tail was a standard issue for the D3 with a float inside!
cheers
walter
See we have another Bf-110 lover, eh?
So MTO convoy escort flight equal oil tank involved? Can't wait!
13.06.2009, 02:26
GJ, Zorin!
Nice to see ur efforts to add missed mods of 110.
Few questions:
Are u sure about tail? AFAIK Bf-110D-0 were modifired from C-version. And they didn`t have enlarged tail (it apperars with D-3). Main difference from C-4 - 1200 liter fuel tank.
Also i didn`t see any photos with D-0/B (0_o).
Nice to see ur efforts to add missed mods of 110.
Few questions:
Are u sure about tail? AFAIK Bf-110D-0 were modifired from C-version. And they didn`t have enlarged tail (it apperars with D-3). Main difference from C-4 - 1200 liter fuel tank.
Also i didn`t see any photos with D-0/B (0_o).
13.06.2009, 05:35
Hi!
Yes I LOVE the 110!
I think that it could be used better in his days!
About D0 I agree with the keeping of the short tail!
cheers
walter
Yes I LOVE the 110!
I think that it could be used better in his days!
About D0 I agree with the keeping of the short tail!
cheers
walter
SEMPER INCOMMODUS
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)