IL2 movie Heavens of Fire UPGR: WITH FULL MOVIE!! 2008
#1

My first Il2 movie it has about one year....i've had some lost of data but i've managed to recover some and i've done it like it looks i hope you will like at least the story..



for trailer : http://www.filefront.com/13831070/TRAIL ... RE_OF.rar/

i excuse myself as i keep u waiting but is a big file the movie has 30 min


http://www.filefront.com/13831660/HEAVE ... RTWMM.rar/ part1


http://www.filefront.com/13958933/undefined part2


http://www.filefront.com/13959677/undefined part3


http://www.filefront.com/13959545/undefined final part 4


[Image: fotomoveie.jpg]


i'm so sorry! for the resolution and quality....and also the big size of the files i've did compress them..but them movie is inm HD /original and also has 32 min lengh..
Thx very much for looking at it...i like the emotional story of the two piltos russian and german that are writing a letter home right the day before the attack...at the start of the movie they're families are reading the letter one month later.....to be onest i know that i was the one that made the movie and i knew how things would end up...but i've cryed..........at the end of the movie..

I'm waiting for your comments
With respect
Ysydor
Reply
#2

I think I saw part1, but downloading again Smile

Will leave comments after seeing the entire movie.
Reply
#3

CONAN Wrote:I think I saw part1, but downloading again Smile

Will leave comments after seeing the entire movie.

yeah i'm sorry u alredy saw first part...now i'm uploading the other parts..cuz is a huge movie..and a huge file it has 30 min!
Reply
#4

Mum!!!
make popcorn!!!! Big Grin
Reply
#5

Very nice!I could feel the emoticons.Thanks for sharing! Big Grin
Reply
#6

ill start by saying i enjoyed "eyes of the enemy" a lot. i was hoping this "feature" length video would be even better.

watched the movie and heres my critique. be advised this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism so please don't take it the wrong way.

First of all, there are some pretty AMAZING camera shots and angles in this. You have great talent with these (as also evident in 'eyes of the enemy'. The visuals are absolutely stunning. I like the beginning, with the shots of the letters. Very unique and well done. I do think the production could have been better though. The voice-overs and radio chatter are way too quiet. Despite some amazing camera angles described before, there is a lot of aimless flying around and repeated scenes for a 30 minute long film. Theres also no real flow to the story, a lot of random scenes in random places. Though I like your pick of score, the score suddenly stops and starts in certain places with no attempt at arrangement with the scenes. Once the battle starts, it gets pretty good, although if this is a story about two pilots from opposite sides, theres no real attempt at letting the audience know who is who and what is happening with them. I just see a bunch of airplanes flying around shooting at eachother. You say you lost data while making this, hopefully that explains a lot of this.

This has potential to be one of the best....Great camera work, but the production and storyline need help.
Reply
#7

aviatorsneah Wrote:ill start by saying i enjoyed "eyes of the enemy" a lot. i was hoping this "feature" length video would be even better.

watched the movie and heres my critique. be advised this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism so please don't take it the wrong way.

First of all, there are some pretty AMAZING camera shots and angles in this. You have great talent with these (as also evident in 'eyes of the enemy'. The visuals are absolutely stunning. I like the beginning, with the shots of the letters. Very unique and well done. I do think the production could have been better though. The voice-overs and radio chatter are way too quiet. Despite some amazing camera angles described before, there is a lot of aimless flying around and repeated scenes for a 30 minute long film. Theres also no real flow to the story, a lot of random scenes in random places. Though I like your pick of score, the score suddenly stops and starts in certain places with no attempt at arrangement with the scenes. Once the battle starts, it gets pretty good, although if this is a story about two pilots from opposite sides, theres no real attempt at letting the audience know who is who and what is happening with them. I just see a bunch of airplanes flying around shooting at eachother. You say you lost data while making this, hopefully that explains a lot of this.

This has potential to be one of the best....Great camera work, but the production and storyline need help.


THx very much for the comment...and yeah before i was reading the last line...that u wrote..i was about to write you that...i've lost.........and that's true i know that there are planes..that are flyng by.-even to much..and we can't understand..who is who and the dialogs..are a pitty in the eyes of the enemy..i think the dialog is good..i've lost about 10 min of movie and those 10 min were the "material"that was made to full up the wholes in the movieSad it happens...but i think the story..is giving you emotions..I didn't understand where are u refering at the score?

thx again
ysydor
Reply
#8

aviatorsneah Wrote:ill start by saying i enjoyed "eyes of the enemy" a lot. i was hoping this "feature" length video would be even better.

watched the movie and heres my critique. be advised this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism so please don't take it the wrong way.

First of all, there are some pretty AMAZING camera shots and angles in this. You have great talent with these (as also evident in 'eyes of the enemy'. The visuals are absolutely stunning. I like the beginning, with the shots of the letters. Very unique and well done. I do think the production could have been better though. The voice-overs and radio chatter are way too quiet. Despite some amazing camera angles described before, there is a lot of aimless flying around and repeated scenes for a 30 minute long film. Theres also no real flow to the story, a lot of random scenes in random places. Though I like your pick of score, the score suddenly stops and starts in certain places with no attempt at arrangement with the scenes. Once the battle starts, it gets pretty good, although if this is a story about two pilots from opposite sides, theres no real attempt at letting the audience know who is who and what is happening with them. I just see a bunch of airplanes flying around shooting at eachother. You say you lost data while making this, hopefully that explains a lot of this.

This has potential to be one of the best....Great camera work, but the production and storyline need help.


aaa i forgot to say taht this was my first movie back in 2008.........
Reply
#9

Downloading right now Smile

Haven't read the aviatorsneah comment yet, will do after posting my own (hope before the end of the day :wink:
Reply
#10

nuk3m Wrote:
aviatorsneah Wrote:ill start by saying i enjoyed "eyes of the enemy" a lot. i was hoping this "feature" length video would be even better.

watched the movie and heres my critique. be advised this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism so please don't take it the wrong way.

First of all, there are some pretty AMAZING camera shots and angles in this. You have great talent with these (as also evident in 'eyes of the enemy'. The visuals are absolutely stunning. I like the beginning, with the shots of the letters. Very unique and well done. I do think the production could have been better though. The voice-overs and radio chatter are way too quiet. Despite some amazing camera angles described before, there is a lot of aimless flying around and repeated scenes for a 30 minute long film. Theres also no real flow to the story, a lot of random scenes in random places. Though I like your pick of score, the score suddenly stops and starts in certain places with no attempt at arrangement with the scenes. Once the battle starts, it gets pretty good, although if this is a story about two pilots from opposite sides, theres no real attempt at letting the audience know who is who and what is happening with them. I just see a bunch of airplanes flying around shooting at eachother. You say you lost data while making this, hopefully that explains a lot of this.

This has potential to be one of the best....Great camera work, but the production and storyline need help.


THx very much for the comment...and yeah before i was reading the last line...that u wrote..i was about to write you that...i've lost.........and that's true i know that there are planes..that are flyng by.-even to much..and we can't understand..who is who and the dialogs..are a pitty in the eyes of the enemy..i think the dialog is good..i've lost about 10 min of movie and those 10 min were the "material"that was made to full up the wholes in the movieSad it happens...but i think the story..is giving you emotions..I didn't understand where are u refering at the score?

thx again
ysydor

what i mean by score is the music if thats what you were asking about. and my review is of THIS video not "eyes of the enemy".
Reply
#11

aviatorsneah Wrote:
nuk3m Wrote:
aviatorsneah Wrote:ill start by saying i enjoyed "eyes of the enemy" a lot. i was hoping this "feature" length video would be even better.

watched the movie and heres my critique. be advised this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism so please don't take it the wrong way.

First of all, there are some pretty AMAZING camera shots and angles in this. You have great talent with these (as also evident in 'eyes of the enemy'. The visuals are absolutely stunning. I like the beginning, with the shots of the letters. Very unique and well done. I do think the production could have been better though. The voice-overs and radio chatter are way too quiet. Despite some amazing camera angles described before, there is a lot of aimless flying around and repeated scenes for a 30 minute long film. Theres also no real flow to the story, a lot of random scenes in random places. Though I like your pick of score, the score suddenly stops and starts in certain places with no attempt at arrangement with the scenes. Once the battle starts, it gets pretty good, although if this is a story about two pilots from opposite sides, theres no real attempt at letting the audience know who is who and what is happening with them. I just see a bunch of airplanes flying around shooting at eachother. You say you lost data while making this, hopefully that explains a lot of this.

This has potential to be one of the best....Great camera work, but the production and storyline need help.


THx very much for the comment...and yeah before i was reading the last line...that u wrote..i was about to write you that...i've lost.........and that's true i know that there are planes..that are flyng by.-even to much..and we can't understand..who is who and the dialogs..are a pitty in the eyes of the enemy..i think the dialog is good..i've lost about 10 min of movie and those 10 min were the "material"that was made to full up the wholes in the movieSad it happens...but i think the story..is giving you emotions..I didn't understand where are u refering at the score?

thx again
ysydor

what i mean by score is the music if thats what you were asking about. and my review is of THIS video not "eyes of the enemy".


aaa k buddy...stay tuned...today i will post..some immages of my next movie..hope u will like it.. Smile
Reply
#12

Hi back Isi,

First of all, is it normal that 3rd part is included in 4th?

In the big lines, I agreed with aviatorsneah (just read his comment).

Of course, you lost a lot of movie part, that's why there are cuts when it couldn't be one, music movements strangely arranged...

Fly-by camera shooting is very too long, and without a big interrest, except sometimes, but in many cases, it's more boring than interresting.

Letters and pictures shoot is very great, but maybe a little too slow. First letter is better captured than second one, but you could increase, in the case of the first one, the timecode by a half faster.

Love when you saw the DCA for the first time firing, following the shell, but could improuve that way, more like Pearl Harbor movie upside down (when the camera follow the bomb droped into the Arizona).

Regarding the voices, it's pretty good, but level could be increased a little more, whatever is the language, but to put us more in the movie.

Just a little line to told that Iulia as a pretty nice voice for a tower operator :wink:

But, as aviatorsneah, it's a constructive critique (as all critiques after all).

Anyway, enjoyed it, and for a first movie, it's good.

Will see The Eyes Of The Enemy, can't wait, teaser is full of promises Smile

CONAN
Reply
#13

Forgot to say: for the next movie, stop using always same musics, everybody use Pirates Of The Caribbeans main theme.

Forgot to ask: what is the music used in the 7:42 - 9:16 lap of time?
Reply
#14

CONAN Wrote:Hi back Isi,

First of all, is it normal that 3rd part is included in 4th?

In the big lines, I agreed with aviatorsneah (just read his comment).

Of course, you lost a lot of movie part, that's why there are cuts when it couldn't be one, music movements strangely arranged...

Fly-by camera shooting is very too long, and without a big interrest, except sometimes, but in many cases, it's more boring than interresting.

Letters and pictures shoot is very great, but maybe a little too slow. First letter is better captured than second one, but you could increase, in the case of the first one, the timecode by a half faster.

Love when you saw the DCA for the first time firing, following the shell, but could improuve that way, more like Pearl Harbor movie upside down (when the camera follow the bomb droped into the Arizona).

Regarding the voices, it's pretty good, but level could be increased a little more, whatever is the language, but to put us more in the movie.

Just a little line to told that Iulia as a pretty nice voice for a tower operator :wink:

But, as aviatorsneah, it's a constructive critique (as all critiques after all).

Anyway, enjoyed it, and for a first movie, it's good.

Will see The Eyes Of The Enemy, can't wait, teaser is full of promises Smile

CONAN


Hy Conan thx u for your time in wathching my movie..and i was expecting negative comments...cuz i know that the movie isn't how i wanted to be..To be onest i didn't wanted to post it...but at the end i was kinda sad for all the work in making the letters and the introduction...cuz i think those are good.
I've lost 10 min of data but in the moment that i've lost it i was short of time,.,,and the intro was already done,,,so i decided to finish it like it is today...The idea of the movie is good /i think/ but some series of errors renders it negative,,,and boring,,,but beyng the first movie,,i think is ok...anyhow the comments are meant to show to the producer the wrong things that he does so...i've learnt more of doing them much better..At least i'm onest and said from the start that at least the story will like u cuz i've knew that the movie wasn't so good.Not like others that post a movie that maybe it even worth to see it...with all the respect of the person who made it.


Anyhow now i'm working fo "the fall of lufftwafe" the battle over The english chanel...i'm moving from the East front on the European one..to change atmosphere.
This movie will be made with another concept in doing movies...and on new realistic level..i don't know how it will be realesed the trailer or even more the movie i hope soon..but i wan't to do it very good.


This is an immage from the movie is not the official wallpaper but i will post it...

[Image: ptcon.jpg]


Thx u

ysydor
Reply
#15

CONAN Wrote:Forgot to say: for the next movie, stop using always same musics, everybody use Pirates Of The Caribbeans main theme.


Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin i agree!

i've seen so many good IL2 movies ruined by good scores from OTHER movies. it just doesnt work. theres plenty of good score music out there besides from these "a-list" movies. i just watched an IL2 video with the score from Apollo 13 and in my mind I kept waiting for a Saturn V to launch LOL. Kind of hard to get through. Took my mind completely off of the point of the film.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)