How do you end WWIII
#16

Pooch: I like them both. Very good endings! I sure do hate to light off more nukes than I have to so I'm leaning towards just Moscow and Stalin. But we have to be sure he is there for it to be effective. All this killing just to get to one man.

How about this? Spies find out that Stalin is in Stalingrad for a tour of the front. When the tour starts he notices that there is an ominous silence on the NATO side almost as if they had pulled back for some reason.

Just then a flight of B29s is picked up on radar at extreme altitude coming in from the South.

Stalin and his staff shove each other in their haste to get to their cars. Stalin is pushed to the ground but manages to get into the last staff car by shooting his chief of staff and pulling him out of the car. The cars careen away from the front when a hay wagon appears from behind a barn and slams into Stalin's staff car. He is not in his car but in the last car in line which slams into the car in front of it going 80.

Stalin is thrown from the car and lands with a sickening thud he is conscious the whole time. He lands at a twisted angle and is on fire. He can see that his right leg has been ripped off but he can't feel the pain. In fact he can't feel anything from the waste down. The flames have cauterized his wounds so he does not bleed to death.

His twisted body lies draped over a railing next to a pig sty. He uses his last ounce of strength and falls off the fence putting out the fire which has charged 90 % of his body. Just when he thinks he can
Reply
#17

Actually, those two posts were the same ending. The second was a continuation of the first, showing the immediate after effect of the bombings.
That wild boar thing is a bit gruesome, isnt it!? Lol! You really don'y like Stalin, do you?
I enjoyed writing that...fun. Those what if scenarios give you a chance to write about history, without having to be historically correct.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)