[IMG] WOP effects
#1

As I also wrote at SAS, I find WOP boring to play, it's just good to fly around with an airplane
for watching the astonishing graphic effects.

The wet effect is too good:

[Image: wet1.jpg]

[Image: wet2.jpg]

[Image: wet3.jpg]
Reply
#2

That first one sells it for me. 8)

Awesome job!

Blue Skies, Happy Landings.

-Doodle
Reply
#3

Where,when,how etc.???????????????????
Reply
#4

WOP= Wings of Prey........james, it's already available.... :wink:
Reply
#5

I am siiiinging in the raaaaain...I
Reply
#6

WOP graphics aren't anything new to me as I have FSX Smile
Reply
#7

[quote="max_thehitman"]I am siiiinging in the raaaaain...I
Reply
#8

[quote="Ectoflyer"][quote="max_thehitman"]I am siiiinging in the raaaaain...I
Reply
#9

KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:[(...) Fsx is good but you need a killer computer for it.

Damn, it's not my case...I think i'll change my machine when SOW comes...in 2012 Big Grin !!!!
Reply
#10

Ectoflyer Wrote:
KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:[(...) Fsx is good but you need a killer computer for it.

Damn, it's not my case...I think i'll change my machine when SOW comes...in 2012 Big Grin !!!!
Well if mine 2.1Ghz, ATi radeon 4570 512mb laptop is a killer machine... Only thing I don't like to use is autogen (random buildings and tree) because of the dramatic fps drop.
Reply
#11

WoP, despite the immaculate graphics, runs better on my machine than IL2 does! Confusedhock:

It has to do with the new engine...with IL2 yer trying to forcefeed a 9 year old game engine thru a new computer at maximum effort...with a new engine like WoP, it is made to run better from the advances in design and better coding. If IL2 was ever made to look as good as WoP, NO machine would run it. Tongue
Reply
#12

Very nice screens. I agree that WoP is nice to look at, but flying is clumsy and unispiring.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)