[RedChico]

Are you an engineer?

Because what you are doing is just stating the obvious, nothing else and you if think you can win the argument by just stating the obvious you are completly wrong.

Unless you present us the reason, the objective of your study, all the calculations, equations, engineering schematics and so on, this is redunctant piece of information.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Are you an engineer?

Because what you are doing is just stating the obvious, nothing else and you if think you can win the argument by just stating the obvious you are completly wrong.

Unless you present us the reason, the objective of your study, all the calculations, equations, engineering schematics and so on, this is redunctant piece of information.

LOL

You really need to read the pdf before you comment

At least once if not twice

[Murph]

Ace, Thanks for the comparison. I think your explanation for using the 51B/w75" is quite clear and your weight adjustments make sense given the data available. When and if real world data for the D-30 becomes available, it will be interesting to see how close you got with that.
At least you were up front about how you did it, which is more than can be said for some.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Ace, Thanks for the comparison. I think your explanation for using the 51B/w75" is quite clear and your weight adjustments make sense given the data available.

Thanks Murph!

Good to know that when someone actually takes the time to read it that it make sense

I was starting to get worried there for a min what with the first wave of replies

Granted my spelling and grammar sucks

But than again I am an employed engineer not an out of work english major!

When and if real world data for the D-30 becomes available, it will be interesting to see how close you got with that.

Yes and if anyone has such data please let me know it is a simple mater to run run the test

At least you were up front about how you did it, which is more than can be said for some.

Bingo!

Which is something that has been sorely lacking in all the comparisons done by others up to now IMHO

[RedChico]

Are you an engineer?

Because what you are doing is just stating the obvious, nothing else and you if think you can win the argument by just stating the obvious you are completly wrong.

Unless you present us the reason, the objective of your study, all the calculations, equations, engineering schematics and so on, this is redunctant piece of information.

LOL

You really need to read the pdf before you comment

At least once if not twice

Well, just to be sure i reread it again.
There's nothing there but data manipulation, assumptions, some equations of averages and nothing more.
You always talking about errors, about IL2 vs Real.

So what's the point?
You trying to convince who?

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Well, just to be sure i reread it again.
There's nothing there but data manipulation, assumptions, some equations of averages and nothing more.
You always talking about errors, about IL2 vs Real.

So what's the point?
You trying to convince who?

Red if you have any specific questions about something in the report that you think is in error

I am all ears

But if all you want to do is express your opinion over and over

Well good on you

Just don't expect me to follow you tit for tat

PS feel free to PM me if you want to ask a dumb question to save face here in the forum

[RedChico]

Well, just to be sure i reread it again.
There's nothing there but data manipulation, assumptions, some equations of averages and nothing more.
You always talking about errors, about IL2 vs Real.

So what's the point?
You trying to convince who?

Red if you have any specific questions about something in the report that you think is in error

I am all ears

But if all you want to do is express your opinion over and over

Well good on you

Just don't expect me to follow you tit for tat

PS feel free to PM me if you want to ask a dumb question to save face here in the forum

What opinion?
Tell me? Show me where do i express my opinion.

Again what is on your report is a bunch of graphs, using basic Statistical equations comparing Real world data Vs IL2 of 2 diferent planes

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Red if you have any specific questions about something in the report that you think is in error

I am all ears

But if all you want to do is express your opinion over and over

Just don't expect me to follow you tit for tat

Others have figured it out

Give it some time, maybe read it again

Than if you have any specific questions

Let me know!

[ACE-OF-ACES]

UPDATE

I replaced the real P-51B with 'calculated' P-51D data

By calculated I mean I adjusted real 67" P-51D to 75" data

I am currently working on the write up that will explane how the data was adjusted, once it is done Ill include the link on page one