team daidalos request for next patch spit 1
#1

would it be possible for team daidalos to include the spit mk1 in a up coming patch please
Reply
#2

Well, this isn't really the place to ask. But they are allowing modders to submit their work and have it checked and verified. So it could be possible. At least thats what I believe.
Reply
#3

Hey Specter, this is where you can make requests to TD: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=8815
Reply
#4

specter Wrote:would it be possible for team daidalos to include the spit mk1 in a up coming patch please

Probably not. Oleg/1C refuses to release any map or plane which might compete with the plane set in SoW. Since the Spit MkI is quintessential British Battle of Britain fighter it definitely competes. If you want your early Western Front plane fix, you're stuck with mods.
Reply
#5

pursuivant Wrote:
specter Wrote:would it be possible for team daidalos to include the spit mk1 in a up coming patch please

Probably not. Oleg/1C refuses to release any map or plane which might compete with the plane set in SoW. Since the Spit MkI is quintessential British Battle of Britain fighter it definitely competes. If you want your early Western Front plane fix, you're stuck with mods.

lol I'd say they're deep in trouble if any il21946 mod competes with their SOW product Wink
Reply
#6

Vpmedia Wrote:
pursuivant Wrote:
specter Wrote:would it be possible for team daidalos to include the spit mk1 in a up coming patch please

Probably not. Oleg/1C refuses to release any map or plane which might compete with the plane set in SoW. Since the Spit MkI is quintessential British Battle of Britain fighter it definitely competes. If you want your early Western Front plane fix, you're stuck with mods.

lol I'd say they're deep in trouble if any il21946 mod competes with their SOW product Wink

LOL :lol:
Reply
#7

Come on, if SOW is really that good, it should be no problem to have a better Spit Mk1 in SOW.

So, please make one for IL2 1946. SOW should beat IL2 1946 by far, right? Or am i wrong? :wink:
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)