Lockheed P-38 early versions.
#1

I now it was discuss many times, but I want refresh this thread.

Maybe creating early versions of P-38 wouldn't require lot of work (I don't now, I'm not a modder). In fact only a cosmetic changes with new FM and new slot like in Spitfire Mk I, even better because we don't have to move gun position.

Did anyone from You (modders) take a chalange ?
Reply
#2

No one wants to shoot Yamamoto flying in proper P-38 version ?
Reply
#3

Not really, but shooting at the P38's themselves is another matter....
Reply
#4

Will love to see it on the Pacific and Europe. So Yes please!
Reply
#5

I believe there is no need for any other version than the F, right?

If so, I will have a chat with the FM guy and see if we can prepare this so there will only be the need for a new Slot by one of the masterminds.
Reply
#6

Sorin there's a navalized version with folding wings, radial engines, hook... Hope to see it someday
Reply
#7

RealDarko Wrote:Sorin there's a navalized version with folding wings, radial engines, hook... Hope to see it someday

...?... Really? Never heard of such a thing... :?

Except...

Wiki, the wise, the great, the all knowing and never wrong Wrote:Lockheed proposed a carrier-based Model 822 version of the Lightning for the United States Navy. The Model 822 would have featured folding wings, an arresting hook, and stronger undercarriage for carrier operations. The Navy was not interested, as they regarded the Lightning as too big for carrier operations and did not like liquid-cooled engines anyway, and the Model 822 never went beyond the paper stage. However, the Navy did operate four land-based F-5Bs in North Africa, inherited from the USAAF and redesignated FO-1.
Reply
#8

RAF_Magpie Wrote:
RealDarko Wrote:Sorin there's a navalized version with folding wings, radial engines, hook... Hope to see it someday

...?... Really? Never heard of such a thing... :?

Except...

Wiki, the wise, the great, the all knowing and never wrong Wrote:Lockheed proposed a carrier-based Model 822 version of the Lightning for the United States Navy. The Model 822 would have featured folding wings, an arresting hook, and stronger undercarriage for carrier operations. The Navy was not interested, as they regarded the Lightning as too big for carrier operations and did not like liquid-cooled engines anyway, and the Model 822 never went beyond the paper stage. However, the Navy did operate four land-based F-5Bs in North Africa, inherited from the USAAF and redesignated FO-1.

Some scale modelers made a nice rendition of this bird, but I just can't find the pics...
Reply
#9

You can have more info here:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_q ... _n13641163

A small pic Wink

[Image: 05.jpg]

[Image: 04.jpg]

[Image: 03-1.jpg]

[Image: 02-1.jpg]

[Image: 01-1.jpg]

I have some amazing skins for it ( not done by me ), early, mid and late war will try to post pics later
Reply
#10

I have a half done campaign for the Trident including some missions on Darwin, midway, Tarawa...
Reply
#11

The F would be great, not interested in the navalized version.
Reply
#12

OMG, that is rather cool! Wicked. Learn something new everyday - I'd be keen on that. Hell, why not both the F and the Radial versions! Both would be cool, and I know personally, the RAF662'nd would KILL for a navalized version of the '38.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)