Can History Teachers Explain This.
#1

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford'.
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford'.

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were both assassinated before their trials.
Reply
#2

What is the source, please ? Or are these findins your own ?
Weird, indeed.
Reply
#3

The things above are just facts put togather about both Presidents.


Deutschmark
Reply
#4

It is really a bit strange, isn't it? Confusedhock:
Reply
#5

Uh huh...

Yep...

I heard that on the radio and read it through the InternNet, but I don't remember the source.

It reminds me of all the "coincidences" around the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, which was also a long list.

Is that a coincidence that two subjects of major world news at the time would both have long lists of coincidences? :lol:


Something beyond the senses is definately happening in the world. It's like the wind: You see its effects but you can't actually see it, as many powerful things are in the universe. :wink:


Fireskull
Reply
#6

Secretary was John Hay
Reply
#7

RadPig94 Wrote:Secretary was John Hay

Am Rad... Not the Secretary of state...
Their secretary's the woman in their office that like brings
them their coffee and takes their notes... :roll:

Deutschmark
Reply
#8

Is time really linear ______ or elliptical 0 ? :twisted:
http://youtu.be/VST2KKIYn50
Reply
#9

Just in case, I'd suggest avoiding any trip around the French-German-Belgian border in 2014 :-? Tongue
Reply
#10

That would be the first place I would go... Confusedhock:
I would get to meet the Red Baron again... Tongue :lol:

Deutschmark
Reply
#11

Wow, thats wild.

You have to wonder when that many things, dates, name's and locations, line up. The truth may never be known, but there is a glimpse into what some might say is a predetermined reality. Both are major incidents, so the "watch maker" would have put a little more time, and thought, into those scripts.
Truth is stranger than fiction.

You just broke my brain. :cs

That's a great song Dauntless, i remember when I first heard it, and was blownaway, buy the depth of thought, and by the natural truth it seems to convey. And I believe they are right, judging from my own experiences here on TerraFirma.
I would get to meet the Red Baron again... :wink:

I think there is a link between us all, for example, I can sense when some one someone chasing me in anger in servers, every body shoots to kill, but you just know when someone is amped, and hell bent on destroying.
Reply
#12

Confusedhock: . . . strange, really strange!!
Reply
#13

That is weird, like New World Order weird... :-?

PS have you seen the film The Adjustment Bureau, thats about how there are unseen forces manipulate us and controlling our destiny.
Reply
#14

It does look a bit odd at first, but the human beings are very good at spotting coincidences like these. Bear in mind that both chronological instances are in America thus share the same culture and nomenclature common to that land, as well as the same social issues.

If you look closer of course the comparisons begin to fall apart. Abraham Lincoln for instance made a big deal about slavery to justify his war against the south but it was largely spin however well intended. Lincoln needed an issue other than economics to fire his population into supporting the war, and what could be more emotive than slavery?

Kennedy had civil rights issues to deal with because the overall treatment of black americans was yet to disentangle itself from the earlier era. Legal acknowledgment certainly, but very few actual rights or respect, indicating that with all good intentions the abolition of slavery was more to do with white politics than black freedom.
Reply
#15

I don't see where it falls apart and here is why.
Abraham Lincoln dealt with slavery of black americans.
Kennedy dealt with treatment of black americans.
Both fall under the blanket of civil rights for black americans.
And as the line above reads;
( Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.)
Regardless of the behind issues why, both had civil rights issues to deal with
That took up most of their terms in office and made their terms look like they
Where both particularly concerned with civil rights.

Deutschmark
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)