10.10.2009, 22:52
What do you need to do to say edit the cockpit of the P-51 so that a small picture of my wife would show up in that sucker? like taped to the control panel somewhere?
Cockpit editing
10.10.2009, 22:59
well why not! if they could make a washing machine fly i would give it a go... But seriously is it possible? cause i have been all through the il2 files and cannot find any cockpit renders....
10.10.2009, 23:10
kg64_Cnopicilin Wrote:Why do you want to fly in a sucker?
lol thats what i was thinking. no offense to anyone, but that crate flat out sucks. if you like stalling in any turn, bank or dogfight. youll love it.
10.10.2009, 23:17
easiest way i know is to download a cockpit repaint such as Freddy's P-51 Cockpit and swap out the pic from there with the one of your wife. thats what i did for my gf's pic.
http://allaircraftsimulations.com/forum/...freddy+p51
S~
WhamO
http://allaircraftsimulations.com/forum/...freddy+p51
S~
WhamO
11.10.2009, 00:12
Fly_zo has done some stuff on this too, check out this thread.. viewtopic.php?t=7963&highlight=photo
11.10.2009, 00:42
HEERDT Wrote:kg64_Cnopicilin Wrote:Why do you want to fly in a sucker?
lol thats what i was thinking. no offense to anyone, but that crate flat out sucks. if you like stalling in any turn, bank or dogfight. youll love it.
Yeah i agree, i was just using it as an example. However if you are real careful at low speeds and use combat flap settings, its a good machine. Personally i like , not in any order, the P-39, P-40, Hurricane, Spitfire, FW190, Mosquito and a few others. But those are the ones i prefer to fly given a choice.
11.10.2009, 02:28
P-51 was designed for high altitude bomber escort.
Not designed for low level combat dog fights.
Hence, the perceived lack of performance.
Not designed for low level combat dog fights.
Hence, the perceived lack of performance.
11.10.2009, 02:28
=BOD=Thing Wrote:P39 goes into a flatspin really easily and then you cant recover it.HEERDT Wrote:kg64_Cnopicilin Wrote:Why do you want to fly in a sucker?
lol thats what i was thinking. no offense to anyone, but that crate flat out sucks. if you like stalling in any turn, bank or dogfight. youll love it.
Yeah i agree, i was just using it as an example. However if you are real careful at low speeds and use combat flap settings, its a good machine. Personally i like , not in any order, the P-39, P-40, Hurricane, Spitfire, FW190, Mosquito and a few others. But those are the ones i prefer to fly given a choice.
11.10.2009, 03:12
Lefty Hartnett Wrote:P-51 was designed for high altitude bomber escort.
Not designed for low level combat dog fights.
Hence, the perceived lack of performance.
yep, due to the laminer flow type wing. it hindered low altitude manuevering , but excelled at high altitude. which is where it was used most. if you read richard curtis's book " dumb but lucky" , he emphasizes that the US mandated 200 hours on the p-51 alone before it was to be flown in combat. a lot of great men died in that aircraft due to their lack of understanding, daringness or lack of skill while flying the p-51 "not" in combat. but in low altitude accidents.
11.10.2009, 03:24
* Moved to the right area.
And lads. Keep it to topic.
If you wanna bimble on about the 51's poor maneuverability, take to spray and pray please.
And lads. Keep it to topic.
If you wanna bimble on about the 51's poor maneuverability, take to spray and pray please.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)