13.12.2007, 12:27
Me too,
I prefer DGen fixed if at all possible.
Cheers.
I prefer DGen fixed if at all possible.
Cheers.
ojcar Wrote:I'd like this idea a lot! My project for China Theatre campaings is paralised because the only suitable map is the Burma map now. I'd like to have some European map to use as a China map (or the Manchuria map). I'd like to add the new maps (Nomonhan, for example), and the possibility of making all the planes flyable in a campaing. I'd like also to make flyable in some campaings some of the "hack planes" I have in campaings (I-185 as Ki-44, Ki-27 as Fokker D-XXI, etc). I'd also like to add the new flyable planes.
I know there is DCG, but I'd like to stay in DGEN. I don't like the "a pilot/squad winning the war" idea. If there is a DCG tuning to make the campaings overcome historically, I would change for DCG
Username Wrote:One example - to assign a skin in DCG takes a couple of clicks. For DGen, you must first find the map being used by your campaign, then the correct .DB file (not always easy), then copy the name of the chosen skin into the file using a particular protocol and then save the change. Do this 20 times and you soon find out what 'boredom' really means. :wink:
ojcar Wrote:Scharnhorst, what I don't like in DCG is the possibility of winning the war alone. If it is realistic, Rudel or Hartmann would win the war alone. I like DGEN for the frustration too. The war is the same with or without me, and my only goal is to survive.... It's my playing style, I think. But if someone teaches me to tuning DCG for historical overcome, I'll try it.
Scharnhorst1943 Wrote:Should I do it as a Private Topic, with all who want to know, or just an open thread? Which would you guys prefer?