Posts: 4.857
Threads: 96
Joined: Jan 2009
If it requires steam you can get modified steamAPI.DLL which is used in every anti-steam crack or illegal release of the game.
Well either way doesn't matter for me - I have Steam
Would be nice if it wasn't on Steam
Planemad
I have a few games on Steam (i.e. ArmA II, Civ V, Left4dead) and no complaints. As long as they don't take away the "single player/offline" option I'm OK with it.
Posts: 362
Threads: 32
Joined: Jan 2008
As long as it contains steam I will not buy COD, and it will go to history grave like "Rise Of Flight" did because of DRM activation.
Follow DRM and steam discussions here: http://il-2-sturmovik.ubi.com/cliffs-of-...uk/?p=1162
and at SAS here: http://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/to...a8d82a8650
Right there with you Stuka, I was really looking forward to this game but now..nahh I'll just stick with 1946. I dont mind the LOMAC Flamimg cliffs Starforce ( about every week or two I have to put the CD in to "verify" its my game) But this crap..no thanks Oleg, I'll pass. All the Hype and then, oh by the way you must have a steam account. Dont have one,dont want one. Screw COD, what is it like six years and Two Weeks TM over due anyway? Whatever.
Steam is okay. Mostly for the Source SDK games. But the support is really really bad.
if they release it only on steam then ill be P!$$ED
Posts: 884
Threads: 41
Joined: Feb 2009
That poll is rigged from the get -go.
Every poll I have looked at shows people
4-1 against Steam. Makes one wonder who is voting.
Take a look at my thread - viewtopic.php?f=99&t=31530
Planemad