Correcting the Jets
#34

ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:
Aymar_Mauri Wrote:
Sojka Wrote:
Aymar_Mauri Wrote:So, the same religious dogmas apply here at AAA?
yeh, and i hope it will stay this way..
Even when clear mistakes are in the files such as incorrect wingspan and wingarea for Spitfire and Ta-152C? I have seen the EM and FM data that were extracted by other people.
This is what worries me. Oleg may well be entering the data in a specific way for the engine (eg. true wing area vs. a calculation based on approximate airflow patterns over the wing). All that it takes is an uniformed person who thinks that the FW-190 should be able to out turn a spitfire at all points in its envelope or that the La-7 is overmodeled...
Well, I got news for you. A simulation's accuracy is measured by the ability to enter proper RL data and get RL performance from the simulation engine. Other than that and you're just making divination and inventing stuff up. If OM's engine can't take RL data and output correct performance comparable to RL performance than you're telling me that he has made, at the very least, a faulty engine and, at the very worst, just a swindle.

And, please, don't talk about "uniformed person who thinks that the FW-190 should be able to out turn a spitfire at all points in its envelope or that the La-7 is overmodeled...".

I'm talking about inputing RL technical data in the engine not making stuff up for suiting one's perception.

Which is exactly what you're doing with your first post. You only talk like "it would be logical" or "feeling":

ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:Additionally, deletion of the outer wing racks on the Ar-234 would be realistic.
Says who? You? Well I might be inclined to consider that just your fantasy. Have any books about that? Any Arado factory report where they mention it? If you have it, I'll be very happy if you can show it to me.

ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:It would also be interesting to mount X-4 on them (this is more plausible than the TA-183 X-4 option which should be removed).
So, now it is "It would also be interesting", not "I have a Arado technical report..." ?

Seems we're going on impressions here. But then again this is just about 1946 planes. So, it just doesn't matter, right?
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)