Reasons why experimental and 'what if' aircraft is worth it!
#20

If you make a airplane that is not physically possible to fly and you make it to fly (as the Lerche), it's exactly the same thing that to use "anti-gravity tech" in my book.

So, not "what if". "What if" can be something like that: how about building a He-280 (it really flew) and make an hypothetical campaign in 1943? See the difference between that and things like "how about building a plane impossible to fly and make it possible to fly and enter in the war" This is pure Sci-fi. Note, I have no problem with that....

A good What if must be "realistic to achieve" historically speaking. If not, there is no "what if". There is pure fantasy.

About "predicted FMs", the question is the same. There were planes cancelled because there were physically not possible to fly in. No Fly by Wire in 1940's. Giving flyable FMs to planes not possible to fly is the same thing than giving them Fly by Wire, or giving them "anti-gravity tech".

Good debate, by the way! :cheers:
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)