Reasons why experimental and 'what if' aircraft is worth it!
#27

SAS~MOSCA Wrote:"First at all, Oleg many FM have s many erros and flaws, so to me, it appear that Oleg FM may have been 'biased"

Can you give me some examples on this, because I find Oleg Flight Models quite realistic compared to the studies I have done.

/Morten
Mosca, i will agree with most of what you said, except the bit i quote above. Oleg's FM's are not bad, and i would assume they are pretty good, but the are not realistic. The main reason for this is because there is no real external environment. and there is nothing to represent the individual engine attributes.
secondly, who knows what the warbirds of the past actually flew like, other than the pilots that actually flew them ? here, we can only really go by data. and as we all know, every plane had its own quirks.

now, an example, at duxford this year, i saw a FW190 take off and initiate a climb from wheels up of less than 40 degrees. I have tried to make this climb in game, but everytime the plane stalls out.
The A6M, i have timed the roll rates and found them to be to slow ( according to data) and they are slightly overpowered, and that is just two planes, so if there are issues like that with them two, who is to say there is not a lot more.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)