06.03.2010, 13:01
I feel that opening it to be able to operate vehicles with guns will make it more popular and draw more money for the aviation aspect of it further in the series. 
To be able to switch to first person infantry would draw thousands more to try it on top of that. After all, the name Storm of War implies more. Look at the Theatre of War series where there was collaboration with another company. I believe that Storm of War will replace it and be far superior.
On strictly a business decision, Storm of War would generate much more gross sale if control of ground units was included. For the fraction of the investment to make them operable, it would create a return on the investment of many fold.
It looks to me as though SoW is headed toward becoming vastly superior to all previous World War Two games and simulations. Pal, I do not think you have to worry about quality with the kind of experience and development that 1C: Maddox Games is revealing. :wink:
To be able to switch to first person infantry would draw thousands more to try it on top of that. After all, the name Storm of War implies more. Look at the Theatre of War series where there was collaboration with another company. I believe that Storm of War will replace it and be far superior.On strictly a business decision, Storm of War would generate much more gross sale if control of ground units was included. For the fraction of the investment to make them operable, it would create a return on the investment of many fold.
It looks to me as though SoW is headed toward becoming vastly superior to all previous World War Two games and simulations. Pal, I do not think you have to worry about quality with the kind of experience and development that 1C: Maddox Games is revealing. :wink: