[Kwiatek]

Hey I thought you said

Nothing more to say. Belive what you want.

I must have hit a nerve?

Eitherway it is good to see that you have more to say and you do care about what I belive

As i said before in 1.8 UP version all new FM's are made in Crimea Map and were adjusted to these map not the Smolensk. So there were difference in performacne the same plane in both map. So new UP planes were ajdusted to RL charts in Crimea Map. It caused that in Smolensk Map the same planes were just too slow and have worse climb rate. So it was affect not only new P-51 but all new planes in UP with new FM's. IN UP 2.0 all these planes were adjusted for Smolensk Map and their performacne issue was fixes. IL2 Compare for stock planes is also based on Smolensk map. So now is accurate to comparison stock and new ones at the same map.

The point your MISSING here is at the time of UP1.8

With those errors you mentioned still in place

A thread was started at the UltraPack site claiming to have the more accurate P51 flight models

I really don't care what the reasons for the errors in were UP1.8

The point is you and yours were claiming UP1.8 P51s were more accurate than the HSFX4.1 P51s

All in all I am glad you guys found your errors and made changes in UP2.0 to make the P51 flight models more like the orginal HSFX4.1 flight models

Lets hope your UP2.01 made even more changes to make them more like the orginal HSFX4.1 flight models

Your old test with P-51 was made with 1.8 UP. And thats why your test is not accurate and wrong for any UP 2.0 version.

So you claim that UP P-51 FM are wrong is not true.

You could check it byself in UP 2.01 and compare it with RL data for P-51.

Actully it was you and your claims over at the UltraPack site that the UP1.8 flight models were more accurate than the HSFX4.1 flight modles that is and was not true

Well you are really hard understanding guy. You stuck with your version and nothinhg change these.

So i will be not repeat myself it is just waste a time.