Thread Closed

strange "gift" packed with mod from SAS ...
#31

Triad773 Wrote:
fly_zo Wrote:changing FM for stock planes is public interest ... always was and always will be



reg
Z

Then it would seem to me that it is not so much the issue of if the FM was changed or not, but more your conclusion-- and your decision to air that conclusion before you were certain or ascertained proof (or at least proof that was irrefutable).


Is this correct?

well, file is named FlightModelMain.class (after hash resolving) ... so open it in certain application and see what can and can't be changed .


But ok , my Yak is back to normal after hash file removal .... so i'm satisfied .

reg
Z
#32

well all you lads at SAS and AAA have made this world good for me in this game . THANKS to you all . ALL YOU LADS STAND AND LOOK ROUND AT THIS AND SAY WE MADE THIS A BETTER GAME . I THANK YOU ALL HAPPY XMAS TO YOU ALL AND STOP THE BICHIN HAVE A GOOD ONE LADS TO ALL Big Grin :wink:
#33

And in what actually a problem? Actually the LOG is absolutely normal and does not contain errors. Many "skilful guys" even would be glad having received such LOG for the analysis Tongue
#34

fly_zo Wrote:...i'm rather sensitive when my stock planes get messed/ changed .

That i can identify with, I'd be tishing bricks too.

I just stick to the packs cause i figure most of that has undergone proper testing, where sometimes being to first to have a new plane might also come with its consequences if you are using a buttons install.

I think its a gamble, and its not paranoia if its true...:wink:


Bill
#35

fly_zo Wrote:well, file is named FlightModelMain.class (after hash resolving) ... so open it in certain application and see what can and can't be changed .


..yes,and you can see it is the original class,only diference is added part at the end to enable it to read fm's that are not in buttons...
#36

Yes nothing wrong. This does not change anything in actual FMs of stock aircraft. Only the display in the console changes, if anything.

This class mod came from Aviaskins about a year ago, and is quite useful to avoid having to update Buttons file continuously. Instead of questioning Sani's work, I would encourage him to carry on doing this, so that users can install his mods with FMs separate from Buttons, without having to worry about Buttons compatibility. Sani, please continue M8! That is the user-friendly modding work we appreciate.

Happy Christmas and Best Wishes to all of you guys, thanks for the joy and upgrades you are bringing to the game and its communities of players. Peace, love, and... whatever you want, except the dark side.
#37

All this nonsense because someone would rather publicly frown and point at another site rather than bother to ask the modder via pm etc about the issue.

Lessons learned we hope :?:
#38

EnsignRo Wrote:
fly_zo Wrote:well, file is named FlightModelMain.class (after hash resolving) ... so open it in certain application and see what can and can't be changed .


..yes,and you can see it is the original class,only diference is added part at the end to enable it to read fm's that are not in buttons...

sorry but then it must be old version (pre 4.09) or something cos without it Yak9 is back to "normal" behavior like in my other two installations ( UI and clean 4.09) .

I have never ever question any FM , here nor at any forum ... never even seriously discussed mod's fm's or stock ones ( except giving support to Hunin's work ) but here is something wrong .


I said it twice already and will say it again ... i don't believe it has anything to do with your work or intentions . For god sake that is the only non AAA mod i cared enough for to install .

It is something wrong here when me alone as 100% offliner trying to protect online gaming cos i was asked to ( when i got this "job" ) .... i shouldn't have bother .

reg
Z
#39

iremember Wrote:All this nonsense because someone would rather publicly frown and point at another site rather than bother to ask the modder via pm etc about the issue.

Lessons learned we hope :?:

oh yes, now let's look at SAS. Admin takes it publicly to ask AAA why the 61 plane pack mod was using his download server? That could have been kept to PM's. SO please, don't jump on one person when another has made an equal mistake.
#40

Someone should put a cap on this discussion till it's not to late and heavy words start flying for such thing. :-?
#41

No need for heavy words....it is an old class,but it does not create any problems on my 4.09 installation...I'll make an update of that file....
#42

@EnsignRo:

Ok then ... i've got your PM

please except my apology for all this fuss ... it wasn't personal .

My latest crucifying at SAS got me more then i expected ... so i have clearly overacted here

as far as i'm concerned this topic is closed ( not locked )

reg
Z
#43

philip.ed Wrote:
iremember Wrote:All this nonsense because someone would rather publicly frown and point at another site rather than bother to ask the modder via pm etc about the issue.

Lessons learned we hope :?:

oh yes, now let's look at SAS. Admin takes it publicly to ask AAA why the 61 plane pack mod was using his download server? That could have been kept to PM's. SO please, don't jump on one person when another has made an equal mistake.

I am not "jumping" on anyone, i am putting forth my opinion as one is supposed to in a forum.

What ever SAS did is of no concern to me as tit for tat seems a little childish don't you think? i do not even know the situation you are refering to.

But to close, maybe two wrongs do not make a right as they say?

Who knows........ :roll:
#44

iremember Wrote:
philip.ed Wrote:
iremember Wrote:All this nonsense because someone would rather publicly frown and point at another site rather than bother to ask the modder via pm etc about the issue.

Lessons learned we hope :?:

oh yes, now let's look at SAS. Admin takes it publicly to ask AAA why the 61 plane pack mod was using his download server? That could have been kept to PM's. SO please, don't jump on one person when another has made an equal mistake.

I am not "jumping" on anyone, i am putting forth my opinion as one is supposed to in a forum.

What ever SAS did is of no concern to me as tit for tat seems a little childish don't you think? i do not even know the situation you are refering to.

But to close, maybe two wrongs do not make a right as they say?

Who knows........ :roll:

well, you were off topic then and you are off topic now .... this is not discussing my way of doing things thread , this is general flight model class file included in mod thread .

so this stops here ....

locked

reg
Z
Thread Closed


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)